Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Murray L. Steinberg, on Behalf of Himself, and All Those Similarly Situated, and Chelsea Renee Steinberg, by Her Next Friend, and Natural Father v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Henrico County, Virginia Lee A. Harris, Jr., Judge James E. Kulp, Judge Murray J. Janus Deanna L. Dworakowski Bremner, Baber & Janus Katherine T. Steinberg Kenneth Shumaker Pauline Kie
Citations: 37 F.3d 1495; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34895Docket: 94-1139
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; October 19, 1994; Federal Appellate Court
Murray L. Steinberg, representing himself and others similarly situated, appealed an order from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia that imposed monetary sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. The appeal was submitted on September 6, 1994, and decided on October 19, 1994, by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, consisting of Judges Wilkinson, Hamilton, and Motz. The appellate court reviewed the district court's reasoning and concluded that the appeal lacked merit. Consequently, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, referencing its prior ruling in Steinberg v. Virginia, No. CA-93-477 (E.D. Va. Dec. 22, 1993). The court decided to forgo oral arguments as the existing record sufficiently presented the facts and legal issues involved.