You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp.

Citation: 110 S. Ct. 833Docket: No. 89-390

Court: Supreme Court of the United States; January 15, 1990; Federal Supreme Court; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The motions filed by Bethlehem Steel Corporation and several respondents regarding participation in oral argument, divided argument, and requests for additional time for oral argument have all been denied. Specifically, the motions from David H. Miller, William W. Shaffer, LTV Bank Group, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of LTV Steel Company, Certain Affiliates, the Official Parent Creditors’ Committee of LTV Corporation, and BancTexas, Dallas, N.A. for divided argument have also been denied.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Divided Argument Requests

Application: Specific motions from various parties for divided argument in the case were denied by the court.

Reasoning: Specifically, the motions from David H. Miller, William W. Shaffer, LTV Bank Group, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of LTV Steel Company, Certain Affiliates, the Official Parent Creditors’ Committee of LTV Corporation, and BancTexas, Dallas, N.A. for divided argument have also been denied.

Denial of Motions for Oral Argument

Application: The court denied all motions related to the participation in oral argument, including requests for divided argument and additional time.

Reasoning: The motions filed by Bethlehem Steel Corporation and several respondents regarding participation in oral argument, divided argument, and requests for additional time for oral argument have all been denied.