Narrative Opinion Summary
The case involves Subafilms, Ltd. and The Hearst Corporation as plaintiffs against MGM-Pathe Communications Co., MGM/UA Home Video, Inc., Warner Home Video, Inc., and Warner Bros., Inc. as defendants. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order on July 26, 1994, remanding the case to the district court for further proceedings that align with its previous en banc decision in Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994). The remand indicates that the court seeks to ensure that the district court's subsequent actions are consistent with the legal conclusions reached in the earlier case.
Legal Issues Addressed
En Banc Decision as Precedential Authoritysubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court emphasizes adherence to the legal conclusions established in its en banc decision for the district court’s future proceedings.
Reasoning: The remand indicates that the court seeks to ensure that the district court's subsequent actions are consistent with the legal conclusions reached in the earlier case.
Remand for Consistency with En Banc Decisionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the case to the district court to ensure that further proceedings align with the legal conclusions of a prior en banc decision.
Reasoning: The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order on July 26, 1994, remanding the case to the district court for further proceedings that align with its previous en banc decision in Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994).