Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Abraham Oseguera-Cervantes
Citations: 24 F.3d 251; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18911; 1994 WL 192073Docket: 93-10566
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; May 16, 1994; Federal Appellate Court
Abraham Oseguera-Cervantes appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 grams of heroin, possession of a firearm by a felon, and unlawful reentry after deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reviewed the case after Oseguera-Cervantes's counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, indicating no arguable issues for appeal, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel. The court conducted an independent review of the record and found no issues warranting further review. As a result, the court granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed the district court's judgment. The case was decided without oral argument, and the disposition is not precedential and should not be cited except under specific legal doctrines.