You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Matter of Wilson

Citation: 2022 NY Slip Op 04635Docket: 2011-04227

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; July 20, 2022; New York; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Learie Richard Wilson, a suspended attorney, sought reinstatement to the Bar. He was admitted on July 26, 2000, and was suspended for one year effective November 1, 2013, due to prior disciplinary actions. His first motion for reinstatement was denied on June 9, 2016. A second motion filed on August 8, 2019, was held in abeyance, pending an investigation by the Committee on Character and Fitness regarding his suitability to practice law. After reviewing the supporting documents and the Committee's report, the Appellate Division granted Wilson’s motion for reinstatement. Consequently, he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law effective immediately, and his name is to be restored to the roll of attorneys. The decision was concurred by all justices present.

Legal Issues Addressed

Effectiveness of Reinstatement

Application: Upon granting the motion for reinstatement, Wilson was immediately reinstated as an attorney, and his name was restored to the roll of attorneys.

Reasoning: Consequently, he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law effective immediately, and his name is to be restored to the roll of attorneys.

Reinstatement of Suspended Attorneys

Application: The court considered Learie Richard Wilson's application for reinstatement to the Bar after a suspension and, following an investigation by the Committee on Character and Fitness, granted his motion.

Reasoning: After reviewing the supporting documents and the Committee's report, the Appellate Division granted Wilson’s motion for reinstatement.

Role of the Committee on Character and Fitness

Application: The Committee on Character and Fitness conducted an investigation into Wilson's suitability to practice law, which was pivotal in the court's decision to grant reinstatement.

Reasoning: A second motion filed on August 8, 2019, was held in abeyance, pending an investigation by the Committee on Character and Fitness regarding his suitability to practice law.