Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Nathaniel Watkins, A/K/A J.R., A/K/A Peanut, A/K/A Nut
Citations: 21 F.3d 426; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15785; 1994 WL 83773Docket: 93-7348
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; March 13, 1994; Federal Appellate Court
Nathaniel Watkins, also known by several aliases, appealed a decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia that denied his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the appeal and found it without merit, affirming the district court's ruling based on its reasoning. The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary, as the existing records sufficiently presented the facts and legal arguments. The appeal was officially affirmed on March 14, 1994.