Narrative Opinion Summary
A majority of the active judges of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals voted to rehear the case of United States v. Edward M. Czuprynski en banc. As a result, the court has vacated its previous opinion and judgment, stayed the mandate, and restored the case to the docket as a pending appeal. The Clerk is instructed to direct the parties to submit supplemental briefs and to schedule oral arguments promptly.
Legal Issues Addressed
En Banc Rehearing in Appellate Courtsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided to rehear the case en banc, which means the case will be reviewed by all active judges of the circuit rather than by a panel.
Reasoning: A majority of the active judges of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals voted to rehear the case of United States v. Edward M. Czuprynski en banc.
Procedural Directions for Supplemental Briefs and Oral Argumentssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The clerk is directed to facilitate the continuation of the appeal process by instructing parties to submit additional briefs and scheduling oral arguments.
Reasoning: The Clerk is instructed to direct the parties to submit supplemental briefs and to schedule oral arguments promptly.
Vacating Previous Opinion and Judgmentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The previous opinion and judgment of the court have been vacated, meaning they are set aside, as the case is restored to the docket for a pending appeal.
Reasoning: As a result, the court has vacated its previous opinion and judgment, stayed the mandate, and restored the case to the docket as a pending appeal.