Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. John H. Connell Francis E. Dail T. Woods J. Gregory Wallace
Citations: 16 F.3d 411; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7320; 1994 WL 38806Docket: 93-7026
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; February 9, 1994; Federal Appellate Court
Cornelius Tucker, Jr. appealed the denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The appeal was submitted to the Fourth Circuit on January 20, 1994, and decided on February 10, 1994. The appellate court, consisting of Judges Widener, Wilkins, and Hamilton, reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, concluding that the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, citing its reasoning as sufficient. Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the existing materials provided adequate information for the court's decision.