You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Brown (William Waddell, Jr.) v. Dupont De Nemours, Co., Eastman /Kodak, Rohm & Haas, Mullin (Frances R., Jr.), Past Dea Directors, Lawn (John C.), Doe (John), Dorsey (George E.), Directors & Deputies, Dea S/a, Belcher (Robert), Butler (Fred), Garcia (Rey), Davis (Gary), Glanz (Wm.), Kelly (Wm. v. , Chandler (Douglas), Watkiewicz (Sigmund), Miller (Charles E., Jr.), Summers (Laguardia), Harris (James), Sparks (Fred), Adams (Theo), Collins (Montreal), Corea (Paulette), Rick

Citations: 16 F.3d 402; 1993 WL 546512Docket: 93-1689

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; December 21, 1993; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

William Waddell Brown Jr. appealed against DuPont de Nemours Co., Eastman Kodak, Rohm and Haas, and several former DEA directors and deputies. The case was adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, resulting in an affirmation of the lower court's decision on December 22, 1993. The appeal was heard from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, presided over by Judge Newcomer. The court's ruling upheld the original findings without modification.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court's Decision

Application: The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the lower court without any modifications.

Reasoning: The case was adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, resulting in an affirmation of the lower court's decision on December 22, 1993.

Jurisdiction of the Third Circuit

Application: The appeal was heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, indicating its jurisdiction over the case originating from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Reasoning: The appeal was heard from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, presided over by Judge Newcomer.