descrybe logo
You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Blount International, Ltd. v. Schuylkill Energy Resources Incorporated, Reading Anthracite Company, Reading Anthracite Coal Company v. Hub., Inc. Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. v. Blount International Ltd., Abb Raymond Enterprise Operation,in C., Combustion Engineering, Abb-Ce Systems, Inc., Bank of New England, N.A., Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Firemans' Fund Insurance Company, Seaboard Surety Company, Bank of New York v. Combustion

Citations: 16 F.3d 402; 1993 WL 544855Docket: 93-1340

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; December 16, 1993; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves multiple parties, including Blount International, Schuylkill Energy Resources, Reading Anthracite Company, and several insurance companies, all in connection with a legal dispute that was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The appeal was numbered 93-1340 and originated from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (E.D. Pa.). The court ultimately affirmed the lower court's decision on December 17, 1993. The affirmation implies that the appellate court found no reversible errors in the proceedings or conclusions reached by the lower court. The details regarding the specific legal issues, claims, or the rationale for the court's affirmation are not provided in the excerpt.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review and Affirmation

Application: The appellate court reviews the lower court's decision and affirms it, indicating no reversible errors were found.

Reasoning: The court ultimately affirmed the lower court's decision on December 17, 1993.

Jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Application: The case was heard and decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, indicating the appellate jurisdiction over the matter.

Reasoning: The case involves multiple parties...in connection with a legal dispute that was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Lack of Reversible Error

Application: The appellate court's affirmation suggests that the proceedings or conclusions of the lower court were free from reversible error.

Reasoning: The affirmation implies that the appellate court found no reversible errors in the proceedings or conclusions reached by the lower court.