You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Walmart Inc., Individually and Dba Walmart Store 384, Walmart Fulfillment Services, LLC, Individually and Dba Walmart Store 384, Walmart Stores Texas, LLC, Individually and Dba Walmart Store 384, and Kaitlyn Tucker v. Shaun Sheppard

Citation: Not availableDocket: 09-22-00187-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; July 14, 2022; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

A joint motion to dismiss the appeal was filed by both Appellants, Walmart entities and Kaitlyn Tucker, and Appellee, Shaun Sheppard, before any briefs were submitted. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth District of Texas granted the motion and dismissed the appeal. The opinion was submitted on July 13, 2022, and delivered on July 14, 2022. The decision was made per curiam by Chief Justice Golemon and Justices Horton and Johnson.

Legal Issues Addressed

Approval of Motion by Appellate Court

Application: The Court of Appeals for the Ninth District of Texas approved the joint motion and dismissed the appeal based on the parties' agreement.

Reasoning: The Court of Appeals for the Ninth District of Texas granted the motion and dismissed the appeal.

Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal

Application: The joint motion to dismiss the appeal was filed by all parties involved before the submission of any briefs, indicating mutual agreement to terminate the appellate proceedings.

Reasoning: A joint motion to dismiss the appeal was filed by both Appellants, Walmart entities and Kaitlyn Tucker, and Appellee, Shaun Sheppard, before any briefs were submitted.

Per Curiam Decision

Application: The decision to dismiss the appeal was made per curiam, indicating a unanimous and unsigned decision by the panel of judges.

Reasoning: The decision was made per curiam by Chief Justice Golemon and Justices Horton and Johnson.