Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Brooks
Citations: 176 Ariz. 113; 859 P.2d 736; 1993 Ariz. LEXIS 116Docket: No. SB-93-0029-D; Disciplinary Commission No. 90-0042
Court: Arizona Supreme Court; September 29, 1993; Arizona; State Supreme Court
The court has reviewed the State Bar's petition for contempt against the respondent and has denied the request to find the respondent in contempt. However, the respondent is suspended for thirty days, starting October 14, 1993. The application for pro bono representation has been denied, along with the request for oral argument. The court affirms the award of costs to the State Bar in the amount of $1,640.69, with additional costs to be determined later. The respondent, Charles Ray Brooks, is mandated to notify all clients of his inability to represent them within ten days and must inform the court of his compliance with this notification requirement.