You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Disbarment Proceedings v. Cheek

Citations: 56 N.M. 106; 240 P.2d 853Docket: No. 5426

Court: New Mexico Supreme Court; January 7, 1952; New Mexico; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

William F. Cheek has been disbarred following a recommendation from the Board of Commissioners of the State Bar of New Mexico. The recommendation, which was subject to oral argument, was presented by Frank Zinn, Assistant Attorney General, representing the Board, and Glenn G. Hilford, representing Cheek. The court, consisting of Acting Chief Justice Sadler, Justice McGhee, Justice Compton, and District Judges Luis E. Armijo and David W. Carmody, approved and confirmed the Board's report in full. Consequently, Cheek's name has been officially removed from the roll of attorneys authorized to practice before the court.

Legal Issues Addressed

Disbarment Proceedings and Recommendations

Application: The court reviews and confirms the recommendation from the Board of Commissioners of the State Bar regarding disbarment.

Reasoning: William F. Cheek has been disbarred following a recommendation from the Board of Commissioners of the State Bar of New Mexico.

Judicial Approval of State Bar Recommendations

Application: The court confirms the Board's report, leading to the official removal of the attorney from the roll of authorized practitioners.

Reasoning: The court, consisting of Acting Chief Justice Sadler, Justice McGhee, Justice Compton, and District Judges Luis E. Armijo and David W. Carmody, approved and confirmed the Board's report in full.

Removal from Roll of Attorneys

Application: As a result of the court's decision, the attorney's name is removed from the list of those authorized to practice law.

Reasoning: Consequently, Cheek's name has been officially removed from the roll of attorneys authorized to practice before the court.

Role of Oral Argument in Disbarment Decisions

Application: Oral arguments were presented by representatives of both the State Bar Board and the attorney facing disbarment, allowing the court to make an informed decision.

Reasoning: The recommendation, which was subject to oral argument, was presented by Frank Zinn, Assistant Attorney General, representing the Board, and Glenn G. Hilford, representing Cheek.