Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Hartman Income Reit, Inc. v. MacKenzie Blue Ridge Fund III, LP.
Citation: Not availableDocket: 01-20-00218-CV
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; March 17, 2022; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
The Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas at Houston issued an order regarding the case Hartman Income Reit, Inc. v. Mackenzie Blue Ridge Fund III, LP, appellate case number 01-20-00218-CV, stemming from trial court case number 2019-21776 in the 80th District Court of Harris County. The court addressed a motion to substitute counsel filed by the appellant's counsel on March 11, 2021. The motion was denied because it did not comply with Rule 6.5, specifically failing to indicate that the motion had been delivered to the appellant personally or via certified and first-class mail. The denial is without prejudice, allowing for the possibility of refiling an amended motion that meets the requirements of Rule 6.5. The order was signed by Judge Peter Kelly on March 17, 2022.