Narrative Opinion Summary
On January 10, 2005, the court granted the reinstatement of John M. Larason to active status. He had been suspended for three months starting August 19, 2004. The Disciplinary Board certified that Larason submitted a verified statement confirming his compliance with the suspension terms and Rule 217 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement. There were no other pending orders of suspension or disbarment against him.
Legal Issues Addressed
Absence of Further Disciplinary Actionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Reinstatement was facilitated by the absence of any additional orders of suspension or disbarment against the attorney.
Reasoning: There were no other pending orders of suspension or disbarment against him.
Compliance with Disciplinary Enforcement Rulessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Reinstatement was based on the attorney's submission of a verified statement confirming adherence to the terms of suspension and relevant disciplinary rules.
Reasoning: The Disciplinary Board certified that Larason submitted a verified statement confirming his compliance with the suspension terms and Rule 217 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement.
Reinstatement of Suspended Attorneyssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court granted reinstatement to active status for an attorney following a suspension period, contingent on compliance with specific disciplinary rules.
Reasoning: On January 10, 2005, the court granted the reinstatement of John M. Larason to active status. He had been suspended for three months starting August 19, 2004.