You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Solomon

Citations: 545 Pa. 630; 682 A.2d 774; 1996 Pa. LEXIS 1788Docket: No. 243 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; September 9, 1996; Pennsylvania; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Eric Foster Solomon is suspended from the Bar of the Commonwealth for one year, effective September 9, 1996. This decision follows the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 2, 1996, and Solomon is required to comply with all provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E. Additionally, he must pay costs to the Disciplinary Board in accordance with Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Legal Issues Addressed

Attorney Suspension for Professional Misconduct

Application: The attorney, Eric Foster Solomon, is suspended from practicing law for a period of one year as a consequence of actions deemed inappropriate by the Disciplinary Board.

Reasoning: Eric Foster Solomon is suspended from the Bar of the Commonwealth for one year, effective September 9, 1996.

Compliance with Disciplinary Procedures

Application: Solomon is mandated to adhere to specific procedural rules following his suspension to ensure proper conduct and compliance with disciplinary standards.

Reasoning: Solomon is required to comply with all provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.

Financial Obligations Following Disciplinary Action

Application: The attorney is held financially responsible for the costs associated with the disciplinary proceedings.

Reasoning: Additionally, he must pay costs to the Disciplinary Board in accordance with Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.