You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Schwerzmann & Wise, P.C. v. Town of Hounsfield

Citations: 126 A.D.3d 1483; 4 N.Y.S.3d 574Docket: Appeal No. 1

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; March 27, 2015; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

An appeal was made from an order issued by the Supreme Court in Jefferson County on January 7, 2014, by Judge James P. McClusky. The order granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment regarding their account stated cause of action. The appellate court has unanimously dismissed the appeal without costs, referencing precedents in Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke, Velzy and Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts, as well as CPLR 5501(a)(1). The decision was rendered by Justices Scudder, P.J., Lindley, Valentino, and DeJoseph.

Legal Issues Addressed

Account Stated Cause of Action

Application: The court's decision to grant summary judgment was based on the plaintiffs' account stated cause of action, which implies an acknowledgment of debt by the defendant.

Reasoning: The order granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment regarding their account stated cause of action.

Summary Judgment under CPLR 5501(a)(1)

Application: The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision to grant summary judgment to the plaintiffs on their account stated cause of action, demonstrating the application of CPLR 5501(a)(1) in affirming lower court decisions.

Reasoning: The appellate court has unanimously dismissed the appeal without costs, referencing precedents in Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke, Velzy and Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts, as well as CPLR 5501(a)(1).