You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

In re the Claim of Wasserman

Citations: 251 A.D.2d 883; 675 N.Y.S.2d 160; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7418

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; June 18, 1998; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

An appeal was filed against the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision denying a claimant's eligibility for additional unemployment insurance benefits under Labor Law § 599. The claimant, who had completed an approved employment training course in typing and data entry, attended job placement classes after exhausting regular benefits. He sought additional benefits based on these classes. The Board denied the request, determining that the job placement classes did not qualify as an approved “career and related training program” as defined in 12 NYCRR 482.2 (b). The law stipulates that additional benefits are only available for programs that lead to specific occupational qualifications or skills. The job placement classes focused on general resume writing and interview techniques rather than specialized training. The court affirmed the Board's decision, concluding that there was no basis to overturn the denial of additional benefits.

Legal Issues Addressed

Definition of Career and Related Training Program under 12 NYCRR 482.2 (b)

Application: The decision emphasized that only programs leading to specific occupational qualifications or skills meet the criteria for additional benefits, which the claimant's job placement classes did not provide.

Reasoning: The law stipulates that additional benefits are only available for programs that lead to specific occupational qualifications or skills.

Eligibility for Additional Unemployment Insurance Benefits under Labor Law § 599

Application: The claimant sought additional unemployment insurance benefits after attending job placement classes, but the request was denied because these classes did not meet the statutory requirements for a career and related training program.

Reasoning: The Board denied the request, determining that the job placement classes did not qualify as an approved 'career and related training program' as defined in 12 NYCRR 482.2 (b).

Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions

Application: The court upheld the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision, finding no grounds to overturn the denial of additional benefits based on the claimant's participation in job placement classes.

Reasoning: The court affirmed the Board's decision, concluding that there was no basis to overturn the denial of additional benefits.