You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Town of Babylon v. N. Y. S. Department of Transportation

Citations: 250 A.D.2d 771; 672 N.Y.S.2d 777; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5812

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; May 18, 1998; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In a hybrid proceeding involving a challenge to a determination by the New York State Department of Transportation and its Acting Commissioner, the petitioners sought a review of a negative declaration issued on September 6, 1995, under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, along with injunctive relief. The Supreme Court of Suffolk County, presided over by Judge Werner, issued a judgment on July 30, 1997, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceedings. The court affirmed its decision, stating that the petitioners' challenges to the negative declaration were barred by the Statute of Limitations, referencing the precedent set in Matter of Young v Board of Trustees, 89 NY2d 846. The court found the petitioners’ remaining arguments to be without merit. Justices Friedmann, Goldstein, Florio, and Luciano concurred with the ruling. A bill of costs was awarded to the respondents who appeared separately and filed individual briefs.

Legal Issues Addressed

Awarding of Costs in Judicial Proceedings

Application: Costs were awarded to the respondents who appeared separately and filed individual briefs, indicating the court's discretion in awarding costs based on participation and contribution to the proceedings.

Reasoning: A bill of costs was awarded to the respondents who appeared separately and filed individual briefs.

Statute of Limitations in Environmental Review Challenges

Application: The court applied the Statute of Limitations to bar the petitioners' challenges to the negative declaration issued by the New York State Department of Transportation.

Reasoning: The court affirmed its decision, stating that the petitioners' challenges to the negative declaration were barred by the Statute of Limitations, referencing the precedent set in Matter of Young v Board of Trustees, 89 NY2d 846.