Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Schwaller v. Squire Sanders & Dempsey
Citations: 249 A.D.2d 195; 671 N.Y.S.2d 759; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4661
Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; April 28, 1998; New York; State Appellate Court
The Supreme Court of New York County issued an order on August 14, 1997, reversing the lower court's denial of the defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing the plaintiff's complaint. The court found that the defendant provided sufficient evidence of legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for the plaintiff's discharge, which the plaintiff failed to adequately challenge. The plaintiff's claims of discrimination were primarily based on two theories: quid pro quo sexual harassment and gender discrimination related to support and training. However, the court noted that the plaintiff did not contest the absence of evidence supporting the quid pro quo claim on appeal. Her remaining allegations included unfair evaluations and a reduced workload due to gender bias, culminating in her termination. To establish a prima facie case of discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and New York’s Human Rights Law, the plaintiff needed to demonstrate that she was a member of a protected class, was discharged, was qualified for her position, and that her termination occurred under circumstances suggesting discrimination. The court acknowledged that the plaintiff's assertions met this minimal requirement; however, the defendant presented comprehensive evidence justifying the termination based on documented evaluations of the plaintiff's performance. The plaintiff's reliance on hearsay statements was deemed insufficient, as she did not provide admissible evidence or a valid excuse for the lack of such evidence, despite extensive discovery over six years. The court concluded that the detailed negative evaluations substantiated the defendant's claim of a legitimate reason for the termination, and the plaintiff's arguments did not provide a factual basis for asserting pretext or bias. Ultimately, the court directed the Clerk to enter judgment dismissing the complaint in favor of the defendant.