You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Snyder v. Perez

Citations: 246 A.D.2d 526; 667 N.Y.S.2d 413; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 157

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; January 11, 1998; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves an appeal in a personal injury lawsuit where the defendant sought summary judgment to dismiss the complaint under Insurance Law § 5102(d). Initially, the Supreme Court of Nassau County granted the plaintiffs’ motion for reargument and denied the defendant's motion, allowing the injured plaintiff a chance to establish a serious injury based on her inability to perform daily activities. However, the appellate court reversed this decision, granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint entirely. The appellate court found that the plaintiffs failed to provide necessary medical evidence, specifically a sworn statement from a physician who recently examined the injured plaintiff, to substantiate the serious injury claim. The injured plaintiff's own admission of missing only about three days of work did not meet the statutory requirements for demonstrating a serious injury. Furthermore, an affidavit from the plaintiff's chiropractor was deemed insufficient due to its lack of objective evidence. Consequently, the appellate court affirmed the order in favor of the defendant, awarding costs to the appellant.

Legal Issues Addressed

Admissibility of Affidavits in Establishing Serious Injury

Application: The affidavit from the injured plaintiff’s chiropractor was found inadequate due to a lack of objective evidence, relying solely on discussions with the plaintiff.

Reasoning: Additionally, the affidavit from the injured plaintiff’s chiropractor, which suggested that her injuries affected her daily activities, lacked objective evidence and was based solely on the chiropractor's discussions with the plaintiff.

Definition of Serious Injury under Insurance Law § 5102(d)

Application: The injured plaintiff's failure to demonstrate an inability to perform usual daily activities for the requisite period led to the dismissal of the serious injury claim.

Reasoning: The court's decision allowed the injured plaintiff to potentially establish a serious injury by demonstrating she was unable to perform her usual daily activities for at least 90 days within 180 days following the injury.

Evidentiary Requirements for Serious Injury Claims

Application: The plaintiffs' failure to provide a sworn statement from a physician who had recently examined the injured plaintiff was deemed insufficient to support their claim of a serious injury.

Reasoning: The court found that the plaintiffs failed to provide a sworn statement from a physician who had recently examined the injured plaintiff, which was crucial for their claim.

Summary Judgment under Insurance Law § 5102(d)

Application: The appellate court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint due to insufficient evidence provided by the plaintiffs to establish a serious injury.

Reasoning: The appellate court modifies the order by granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint in its entirety.