You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

In re Shannon Monique W.

Citations: 245 A.D.2d 86; 666 N.Y.S.2d 121; 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12785

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; December 8, 1997; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In a case before the Family Court of Bronx County, the court terminated the respondent's parental rights due to a determination of chronic mental illness, as stipulated under Social Services Law § 384-b (4)(c). This decision, made on November 2, 1995, was unanimously affirmed. The respondent had a documented history of mental illness since 1987, characterized by repeated hospitalizations and poor compliance with treatment plans. The court-appointed psychiatrist testified that the respondent was unlikely to provide adequate care for the child in the foreseeable future. Though the respondent's psychiatrist mentioned her ability to care for the child during stable periods, he acknowledged the unpredictability of her compliance with treatment and did not evaluate the risk of neglect. The court's decision, concurred by Justices Ellerin, Wallach, Mazzarelli, Andrias, and Colabella, was influenced heavily by the psychiatric evaluations, reinforcing the permanency of the termination of parental rights in light of the respondent's mental health challenges.

Legal Issues Addressed

Evidence of Chronic Mental Illness in Parental Rights Cases

Application: The court considered the respondent's history of mental illness, lack of treatment compliance, and inability to recognize the severity of her condition as key evidence for terminating parental rights.

Reasoning: Key evidence included the respondent's history of mental illness dating back to 1987, which involved repeated and extended hospitalizations, poor treatment compliance, and an inability to recognize the severity of her condition.

Role of Expert Testimony in Family Court Decisions

Application: A court-appointed psychiatrist's testimony that the respondent could not provide proper care in the foreseeable future was pivotal in affirming the termination of parental rights.

Reasoning: A court-appointed psychiatrist concluded that the respondent would not be capable of providing proper care for the child in the foreseeable future, supporting the termination under Social Services Law § 384-b (4)(c).

Termination of Parental Rights under Social Services Law § 384-b (4)(c)

Application: The respondent's parental rights were terminated due to chronic mental illness, as she was found incapable of providing proper care for the child.

Reasoning: The Order of disposition from the Family Court of Bronx County, entered on November 2, 1995, terminated the respondent's parental rights to the subject child due to a finding of chronic mental illness.