Narrative Opinion Summary
Judgment from the Supreme Court, Chemung County, dismissing a petitioner's CPLR article 78 application to challenge a determination by the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, which found the petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule, is affirmed. The court issued no opinion on the matter. The decision was concurred by Justices Peters, Lahtinen, Garry, Devine, and Clark. The judgment is affirmed without costs.
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation of Lower Court's Decisionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The judgment from the lower court dismissing the CPLR article 78 application was affirmed by the appellate court.
Reasoning: The judgment is affirmed without costs.
Concurrence Among Justicessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision to affirm the dismissal of the petitioner's application was concurred by multiple justices, indicating unanimous agreement.
Reasoning: The decision was concurred by Justices Peters, Lahtinen, Garry, Devine, and Clark.
CPLR Article 78 Applicationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court dismissed the petitioner's CPLR article 78 application challenging the determination by the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision.
Reasoning: Judgment from the Supreme Court, Chemung County, dismissing a petitioner's CPLR article 78 application to challenge a determination by the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, which found the petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule, is affirmed.