Narrative Opinion Summary
Appeal from a Supreme Court judgment in Chemung County, dated March 27, 2013, which dismissed a petitioner's application for a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The petitioner sought to review a determination by the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, who found the petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The appellate court affirmed the judgment without issuing an opinion, with Justices Peters, Lahtinen, Garry, Devine, and Clark concurring. The ruling was made without costs.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Court Affirmationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court affirmed the Supreme Court's judgment without issuing an opinion and ruled without costs.
Reasoning: The appellate court affirmed the judgment without issuing an opinion, with Justices Peters, Lahtinen, Garry, Devine, and Clark concurring. The ruling was made without costs.
CPLR Article 78 Proceedingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The petitioner's application for a CPLR article 78 proceeding was dismissed by the Supreme Court, and this dismissal was affirmed by the appellate court.
Reasoning: Appeal from a Supreme Court judgment in Chemung County, dated March 27, 2013, which dismissed a petitioner's application for a CPLR article 78 proceeding.
Prison Disciplinary Rule Violationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The petitioner was found guilty by the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision of violating a prison disciplinary rule, a finding that the petitioner sought to challenge.
Reasoning: The petitioner sought to review a determination by the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, who found the petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.