You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Bonfeld v. Suburban Transit Corp.

Citations: 236 A.D.2d 335; 654 N.Y.S.2d 354; 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1672

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; February 26, 1997; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the Supreme Court of Bronx County, led by Justice Howard R. Silver, reversed an earlier decision that had granted a motion to change the venue from Bronx County to Westchester County. The case centers on a public school teacher, the plaintiff, who sustained serious injuries as a passenger on a bus operated by the defendant, Suburban Transit. The injury occurred due to alleged negligence by the bus driver, defendant Alicea, who abruptly stopped the bus. Despite Suburban Transit being based in New Jersey and Alicea residing in Manhattan, the plaintiff lived in Westchester County. The defendants sought a venue change citing convenience for the parties, including the plaintiff. However, the court found that the change was erroneous, emphasizing that transitory actions should be tried in the county where the cause of action arose—Bronx County, in this instance, where the accident took place. The court concluded that unless there are compelling reasons, the venue should remain in the original county, particularly when local witnesses and investigative records are involved. Consequently, the motion for a venue change was denied unanimously without costs.

Legal Issues Addressed

Motion for Venue Change Based on Convenience

Application: Defendants' motion for a venue change based on convenience was denied, as the venue should remain in the county related to the origin of the action unless compelling reasons are presented.

Reasoning: The motion for a venue change was based on convenience for the parties, including the plaintiff. The ruling emphasizes that unless compelling reasons are presented, the venue should remain in the county related to the origin of the action.

Venue Selection in Transitory Actions

Application: The court determined that the venue for transitory actions should be in the county where the cause of action arose, which in this case was Bronx County.

Reasoning: The court found the initial venue change erroneous since transitory actions are typically tried in the county where the cause of action arose, which in this case is Bronx County, where the accident occurred.