You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Damaskinos

Citations: 227 A.D.2d 627; 643 N.Y.S.2d 393; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6065

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; May 28, 1996; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In a case concerning a permanent stay of arbitration, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (the petitioner) appealed an order from the Supreme Court, Nassau County, which denied its petition. The court dismissed the appeal with costs, concluding that the petitioner had waived its right to appeal by arbitrating the claim. The decision referenced several precedents, including *Matter of Beagle*, *Matter of State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v Blumen*, and *Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. v Rothbart*, to support this conclusion. The justices Bracken, Miller, Joy, Hart, and Krausman concurred with the ruling.

Legal Issues Addressed

Concurrence of Justices in Arbitration Appeals

Application: The ruling was unanimous among the justices, indicating a collective agreement on the application of the waiver principle in this arbitration appeal case.

Reasoning: The justices Bracken, Miller, Joy, Hart, and Krausman concurred with the ruling.

Judicial Precedent in Arbitration Cases

Application: The decision to deny the appeal was supported by referencing previous cases, demonstrating the reliance on established legal precedents to affirm the waiver of appeal rights in arbitration contexts.

Reasoning: The decision referenced several precedents, including *Matter of Beagle*, *Matter of State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v Blumen*, and *Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. v Rothbart*, to support this conclusion.

Waiver of Right to Appeal in Arbitration

Application: The court determined that Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company waived its right to appeal by choosing to arbitrate the claim, indicating that participation in arbitration proceedings can forfeit the ability to contest the outcome through appeal.

Reasoning: The court dismissed the appeal with costs, concluding that the petitioner had waived its right to appeal by arbitrating the claim.