You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Brito v. Stratford Five Realty, LLC

Citations: 118 A.D.3d 472; 987 N.Y.S.2d 380

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; June 10, 2014; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the Supreme Court of Bronx County addressed a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, Triumph Construction Corp., seeking dismissal of a complaint alleging negligence. The plaintiff sustained injuries from a fall on an uneven and broken sidewalk in March 2009, near a site where Triumph had conducted construction work since September 2008. The defendant argued that their work did not impact the sidewalk where the incident occurred. However, evidence presented, including a daily work report and sketch, indicated that the northwest sidewalk, where the fall happened, was part of Triumph's work area. The court found that the proximity and nature of Triumph's construction activities raised a triable issue of fact regarding their potential contribution to the dangerous condition of the sidewalk. As such, the court unanimously affirmed the denial of the summary judgment motion, indicating that the case should proceed to trial to resolve these factual disputes. The decision reflects the judiciary's role in ensuring that claims involving possible negligence are thoroughly examined when material facts remain contested.

Legal Issues Addressed

Admissibility of Evidence in Civil Cases

Application: The court considers documentary evidence, such as daily work reports and sketches, to determine the work area and potential liability of the defendant.

Reasoning: Triumph's claim of not working on the sidewalk at the site of the fall is contradicted by their daily work report from September 4, 2008, which includes a sketch indicating the northwest sidewalk as a work area.

Negligence and Duty of Care in Construction

Application: The case examines whether the construction company’s activities at the site contributed to the hazardous condition of the sidewalk, creating a triable issue of fact.

Reasoning: Although Triumph contends that this work did not affect the sidewalk where the plaintiff fell, the proximity of the work creates a triable issue of fact regarding whether their activities contributed to the sidewalk's condition that led to the plaintiff's fall.

Summary Judgment under Civil Procedure Law

Application: The court evaluates whether there are material facts in dispute that preclude granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant.

Reasoning: The order from the Supreme Court of Bronx County, issued by Judge Sharon A.M. Aarons on December 27, 2012, denies defendant Triumph Construction Corp.'s motion for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint against it.