Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Halmar Corp. v. Hudson Foundations, Inc.
Citations: 212 A.D.2d 504; 623 N.Y.S.2d 112; 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1032
Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; February 5, 1995; New York; State Appellate Court
In a legal action for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and fraud, the defendant Jablonski, Mead Associates, Inc. appealed an order from the Supreme Court, Westchester County, which denied its motion to dismiss the sixth cause of action (negligent misrepresentation) against it. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's order, citing the reasoning in Halmar Corp. v Hudson Founds., which supported the denial of the dismissal motion. The court's decision was unanimous, with Judges Rosenblatt, Ritter, Copertino, and Florio concurring. Costs were awarded to the plaintiff.