You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

In re Greenblatt

Citations: 212 A.D.2d 83; 628 N.Y.S.2d 605; 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7687

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; July 10, 1995; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves the disciplinary proceedings against an attorney who submitted a resignation affidavit acknowledging his inability to defend against multiple allegations of professional misconduct, including the misappropriation and commingling of fiduciary funds. The attorney, facing approximately 41 complaints, voluntarily resigned, acknowledging his status as a subject of a pending disciplinary proceeding and understanding the potential consequences under Judiciary Law §90 (6-a), including restitution and reimbursement obligations. The Grievance Committee's counsel recommended acceptance of the resignation, which the court duly accepted. Consequently, the court ordered the immediate disbarment of the attorney and directed the removal of his name from the roll of attorneys. The court also mandated compliance with rules governing disbarred attorneys, effectively prohibiting him from practicing law or holding himself out as an attorney in any capacity. The decision underscores the gravity of professional misconduct and the stringent measures enforced by the court to uphold the integrity of the legal profession.

Legal Issues Addressed

Disbarment as a Disciplinary Measure

Application: The court accepted the resignation affidavit and ordered the immediate disbarment of the respondent due to admitted professional misconduct.

Reasoning: The court accepted his resignation, disbarred him immediately, and ordered his name to be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Obligations under Judiciary Law §90 (6-a)

Application: The respondent acknowledged potential obligations for restitution and reimbursement under Judiciary Law §90 (6-a) as part of the consequences of his resignation.

Reasoning: Greenblatt affirmed that his resignation was made voluntarily and without coercion, fully understanding the consequences, including possible restitution and reimbursement obligations under Judiciary Law §90 (6-a).

Prohibition from Practicing Law Post-Disbarment

Application: The disbarred attorney is prohibited from practicing law or representing himself as an attorney in any capacity following the court's order.

Reasoning: Greenblatt is mandated to adhere to the rules governing disbarred attorneys and prohibited from practicing law or representing himself as an attorney in any capacity.

Voluntary Resignation Affidavit in Disciplinary Proceedings

Application: The respondent submitted a resignation affidavit acknowledging his inability to defend against allegations of professional misconduct, leading to the acceptance of his resignation.

Reasoning: Joseph Greenblatt submitted a resignation affidavit on May 30, 1995, acknowledging his status as a subject of a pending disciplinary proceeding for professional misconduct.