You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Lentine v. Mill Basin Marine, Inc.

Citations: 210 A.D.2d 458; 620 N.Y.S.2d 1003; 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13190

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; December 26, 1994; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves an appeal by the plaintiff seeking to nullify a notice of lien and sale and recover damages for the sinking of their vessel. Initially, the Supreme Court, Kings County, granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Mill Basin Marine, Inc., dismissing the complaint. The court's May 18, 1993 order upheld this decision, allowing Mill Basin to foreclose on its lien. The plaintiff's subsequent motion to reargue the decision and to stay the foreclosure sale was denied. Upon reargument, the court found no misapprehension of fact or law in Mill Basin's motion, maintaining its original ruling. The appellate court concurred with the lower court, affirming the decision and awarding costs to Mill Basin. The plaintiff's new argument, introduced for the first time on appeal, was not preserved for review and lacked merit. The court's decision underscores the importance of raising all relevant arguments at the trial level.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court's Ruling

Application: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, which had granted summary judgment to the defendant and dismissed the complaint against it.

Reasoning: The court affirmed the May 18 order, awarding costs to Mill Basin.

Reargument and Preservation of Issues for Appeal

Application: The plaintiff's argument, raised for the first time on appeal, was found to be unpreserved and without merit, and the court denied the plaintiff’s motion for reargument.

Reasoning: The plaintiff sought to reargue the decision... Upon reargument, the Supreme Court maintained its initial ruling... The plaintiff’s additional argument raised for the first time on appeal was deemed unpreserved and without merit.

Summary Judgment on Foreclosure of Lien

Application: The court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Mill Basin Marine, Inc., allowing for foreclosure of its lien on the plaintiff's vessel.

Reasoning: Mill Basin's cross motion for summary judgment was granted, allowing for foreclosure of its lien.