You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Williamsburg Steel Products Co. v. Shevlin-Manning, Inc.

Citations: 90 A.D.2d 550; 455 N.Y.S.2d 127; 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18604

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; October 25, 1982; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Defendant appealed an order from the Supreme Court, Kings County, which denied its motion to change venue from Kings County to Erie County in a contract dispute. The appellate court reversed this order, granting the change of venue and awarding $50 in costs and disbursements. Under CPLR 510(3), an affidavit supporting a motion to change venue must include the names, addresses, occupations of prospective witnesses, and the substance and materiality of their expected testimony. The defendant provided detailed information for 10 witnesses residing in Erie County, while the plaintiff's opposing affidavit failed to include names, addresses, or the substance of its witnesses’ testimony, rendering it inadequate. The court concluded that the Special Term abused its discretion in denying the motion for a change of venue based on the deficiencies in the plaintiff’s affidavit. Judges Damiani, Weinstein, Gulotta, and O’Connor concurred in this decision.

Legal Issues Addressed

Abuse of Discretion by Lower Court

Application: The appellate court concluded that the lower court abused its discretion by denying the motion for a change of venue due to the inadequacies in the plaintiff's affidavit.

Reasoning: The court concluded that the Special Term abused its discretion in denying the motion for a change of venue based on the deficiencies in the plaintiff’s affidavit.

Change of Venue under CPLR 510(3)

Application: The appellate court reversed the lower court's decision, granting the defendant's motion for a change of venue after determining that the plaintiff's affidavit was inadequate.

Reasoning: The appellate court reversed this order, granting the change of venue and awarding $50 in costs and disbursements.

Requirements for Affidavit Supporting Motion for Change of Venue

Application: The court emphasized that an affidavit must include detailed information about prospective witnesses for a successful motion to change venue.

Reasoning: Under CPLR 510(3), an affidavit supporting a motion to change venue must include the names, addresses, occupations of prospective witnesses, and the substance and materiality of their expected testimony.

Sufficiency of Plaintiff's Opposing Affidavit

Application: The court found the plaintiff's opposing affidavit inadequate because it lacked essential details about witnesses, contributing to the decision to grant the change of venue.

Reasoning: The defendant provided detailed information for 10 witnesses residing in Erie County, while the plaintiff's opposing affidavit failed to include names, addresses, or the substance of its witnesses’ testimony, rendering it inadequate.