Narrative Opinion Summary
A party seeking to restore a case to the trial calendar must satisfy four conditions: demonstrate a meritorious cause of action, provide a reasonable excuse for the delay, show a lack of intent to abandon the action, and prove the absence of prejudice to the opposing party. All four criteria must be met. In this instance, the plaintiff failed to offer any excuse for waiting over three years to seek relief after a dismissal for failure to appear. Any justification related to law office failure was unsubstantiated. The attempt to demonstrate merit in the attorney's reply, without an affidavit from someone knowledgeable about the facts, was deemed insufficient.
Legal Issues Addressed
Meritorious Cause of Action Affidavit Requirementsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The plaintiff's attempt to demonstrate merit without an affidavit from a knowledgeable source was inadequate, emphasizing the necessity of proper affidavits in such motions.
Reasoning: The attempt to demonstrate merit in the attorney's reply, without an affidavit from someone knowledgeable about the facts, was deemed insufficient.
Reasonable Excuse for Delaysubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The plaintiff's failure to provide any excuse for a delay exceeding three years resulted in the inability to restore the case, highlighting the critical nature of this requirement.
Reasoning: In this instance, the plaintiff failed to offer any excuse for waiting over three years to seek relief after a dismissal for failure to appear.
Restoration to Trial Calendar Requirementssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case underscores the necessity for a party to meet all four criteria when seeking to restore a case to the trial calendar, including providing a reasonable excuse for any delay.
Reasoning: A party seeking to restore a case to the trial calendar must satisfy four conditions: demonstrate a meritorious cause of action, provide a reasonable excuse for the delay, show a lack of intent to abandon the action, and prove the absence of prejudice to the opposing party.
Unsubstantiated Law Office Failuresubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Unsubstantiated claims of law office failure were insufficient to meet the criteria for restoring the case to the trial calendar.
Reasoning: Any justification related to law office failure was unsubstantiated.