You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Tower Insurance v. New Wok Hing Trading, Inc.

Citations: 89 A.D.3d 1079; 933 N.Y.2d 717

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; November 28, 2011; New York; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves a personal injury lawsuit filed by an injured party and his spouse against a business owner and his company, following an accident that occurred during the delivery of goods. The defendants, covered under a commercial liability insurance policy, failed to promptly notify their insurer, Tower Insurance Company of New York, about the accident and ensuing lawsuit. Tower Insurance sought a declaratory judgment to confirm its lack of obligation to defend or indemnify the defendants, citing untimely notice. The Supreme Court granted summary judgment in favor of Tower, concluding that the injured parties did not adequately demonstrate diligence in identifying the insurer to justify their delayed notification. The court reiterated that under Insurance Law § 3420(a), the burden lies with the injured party to prove diligent efforts in notifying the insurer. As a result, the matter was remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to enter a judgment declaring that Tower is not required to defend or indemnify the defendants in the personal injury action.

Legal Issues Addressed

Diligence in Identifying Insurer

Application: The court determined that Jiang and Dong did not demonstrate the necessary diligence in identifying Tower as the insurer, which was required to justify their delayed notification.

Reasoning: Jiang and Dong opposed, claiming they made diligent efforts to ascertain Tower's identity and provided timely notice thereafter. The Supreme Court granted Tower’s motion for summary judgment, affirming that Jiang and Dong did not adequately explain the delay in notifying Tower and did not demonstrate diligent efforts to identify the insurer.

Obligation to Notify Insurer

Application: The court found that New Wok and Lin failed to notify Tower Insurance in a timely manner, which was crucial for maintaining coverage under the commercial liability policy.

Reasoning: Jiang and his wife, Xiu-Mei Dong, initiated a personal injury lawsuit against Lin and New Wok on September 12, 2007. At the time of the accident, New Wok and Lin were covered under a general commercial liability policy with Tower Insurance Company of New York. However, they failed to notify Tower of the accident until November 15, 2007, over five months after the incident and more than two months post-lawsuit filing.

Rights Under Insurance Law § 3420(a)

Application: The decision highlighted the right of an injured party to notify the insurer under Insurance Law § 3420(a), but stressed the burden on the injured party to prove diligence in doing so.

Reasoning: The court emphasized that under Insurance Law § 3420(a), an injured party has the right to notify the insurer, but bears the burden of proving diligent efforts in doing so.