Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
LYFT, INC. v. DIST. CT. (DAVIS)
Citation: 2021 NV 86Docket: 82148
Court: Nevada Supreme Court; December 29, 2021; Nevada; State Supreme Court
Original Court Document: View Document
The case involves Lyft, Inc. as the petitioner against the Eighth Judicial District Court and Kalena Davis as the real party in interest. The Supreme Court of Nevada is handling the original proceeding classified as a civil mandamus request. The case status indicates that a writ has been issued, and it was submitted for decision without oral argument on October 22, 2021. Key procedural details include: - The petition for writ of mandamus was filed on December 2, 2020, along with multiple appendices. - The court granted extensions for responses, including an order striking Davis's initial answer due to its excessive length, leading to the requirement for a compliant answer within 14 days. - The real party in interest filed an amended answer on April 26, 2021, followed by Lyft’s amended reply on May 17, 2021. - The case drew attention to the constitutionality of NRS 52.380, as certified to the Attorney General on September 20, 2021. - The Supreme Court issued its opinion on December 30, 2021, granting the petition and concluding the matter with a writ sent for service upon the lower court. For official records or additional documents, parties are directed to contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada. The case is noted as involving significant procedural history and constitutional implications.