Narrative Opinion Summary
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued a decision on July 12, 1991, regarding case number 90-7126, which involved multiple appellants, including Carr, Phillips, and others. The court addressed the denial of rehearing en banc, indicating that the request for a full court review of the panel's prior decision was not granted. This denial suggests that the court found no substantial grounds for reconsidering the case by a larger group of judges. The ruling also references earlier case law and procedural rules relevant to the decision-making process regarding en banc hearings. The document highlights the importance of the appeals process and the standards applied when determining whether a case merits further review by the full court.
Legal Issues Addressed
Denial of Rehearing En Bancsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court determined that there were no substantial grounds to convene a full court review, thus denying the rehearing en banc.
Reasoning: The court addressed the denial of rehearing en banc, indicating that the request for a full court review of the panel's prior decision was not granted.
Procedural Rules for En Banc Hearingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The ruling makes reference to procedural rules that guide the decision-making process on whether to grant an en banc hearing.
Reasoning: The ruling also references earlier case law and procedural rules relevant to the decision-making process regarding en banc hearings.
Standards for En Banc Reviewsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision underscores the standards applied by the court when assessing whether a case warrants further review by the full court.
Reasoning: The document highlights the importance of the appeals process and the standards applied when determining whether a case merits further review by the full court.