Narrative Opinion Summary
The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal regarding the part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the Supreme Court's denial of the appellant's motion to renew. This dismissal was made without costs and was initiated by the Court itself, as the specific portion of the order in question does not constitute a final determination of the action as required by the Constitution. Additionally, the Court dismissed the appeal on other grounds, stating that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved, also without costs.
Legal Issues Addressed
Final Determination Requirement under Constitutional Lawsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because the order from the Appellate Division did not represent a final determination of the action as required by the Constitution.
Reasoning: This dismissal was made without costs and was initiated by the Court itself, as the specific portion of the order in question does not constitute a final determination of the action as required by the Constitution.
Substantial Constitutional Question Requirementsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that there was no substantial constitutional question directly involved.
Reasoning: Additionally, the Court dismissed the appeal on other grounds, stating that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved, also without costs.