Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Washam v. Hartsfield
Citations: 456 S.W.3d 434; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1287; 2014 WL 6463320Docket: WD 77260
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals; November 17, 2014; Missouri; State Appellate Court
Appellant Kenneth Washam appeals a judgment from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, which ruled in favor of Respondents Amy and Wallace Hartsfield after a trial de novo regarding a small claims property dispute. The reviewing court found that the judgment is backed by substantial evidence, is consistent with the weight of the evidence, and does not involve any legal errors. A formal written opinion was deemed unnecessary, but a memorandum outlining the rationale for the decision has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).