Narrative Opinion Summary
The State of Missouri appeals a trial court decision that granted Dominick Parks’ motion to suppress evidence obtained during his arrest for driving while intoxicated, arguing that there was a lack of probable cause for the arrest. The appellate court affirms the trial court's order, stating that a published opinion would provide no precedential value and therefore issues a memorandum to the parties instead. The decision is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Court's Use of Rule 30.25(b)subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court decided not to publish a full opinion as it would provide no precedential value, instead issuing a memorandum to the parties involved.
Reasoning: The appellate court affirms the trial court's order, stating that a published opinion would provide no precedential value and therefore issues a memorandum to the parties instead.
Probable Cause for Arrestsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision to suppress evidence due to a lack of probable cause for the arrest of Dominick Parks.
Reasoning: The State of Missouri appeals a trial court decision that granted Dominick Parks’ motion to suppress evidence obtained during his arrest for driving while intoxicated, arguing that there was a lack of probable cause for the arrest.