Narrative Opinion Summary
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated its previous opinion and reversed the district court's decision regarding Rene Martin Verdugo-Urquidez, following a mandate from the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's ruling in United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, certified on April 16, 1990, necessitated this action. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings that align with the Supreme Court's opinion. The panel of judges included WALLACE, NORRIS, and THOMPSON, and the decision was rendered on May 16, 1990.
Legal Issues Addressed
Remand for Further Proceedingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case is sent back to the district court for actions that are consistent with the Supreme Court's ruling.
Reasoning: The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings that align with the Supreme Court's opinion.
Supreme Court Mandate on Appellate Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is required to vacate its previous opinion and reverse the district court's decision due to a mandate from the United States Supreme Court.
Reasoning: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated its previous opinion and reversed the district court's decision regarding Rene Martin Verdugo-Urquidez, following a mandate from the United States Supreme Court.