You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Bennett v. Oklahoma Merit Protection Commission

Citations: 849 P.2d 391; 1991 OK 99; 64 O.B.A.J. 954; 1991 Okla. LEXIS 151; 1991 WL 489550Docket: No. 77766

Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma; October 2, 1991; Oklahoma; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case concerns the procedural obligations and jurisdictional limitations of the Oklahoma Merit Protection Commission. The Commission is directed to conduct a hearing within thirty days in the matter of J.B. Bennett v. Oklahoma Tourism Commission, as mandated by statute 74 O.S.Supp.1986 § 841.7. The statute's language requires the Commission to act upon a request for review without discretion to dismiss cases deemed meritless by the director. In contrast, a separate mandamus petition involving J.B. Bennett against Governor David Walters is denied due to the Commission's lack of jurisdiction, as stipulated by Oklahoma Constitution Article VIII, Section 1. The court's decision reflects a strict interpretation of statutory mandates and constitutional jurisdictional boundaries, with concurring and dissenting opinions from the justices. The outcome affirms the mandatory hearing requirement while delineating the limits of the Commission's authority concerning state officials.

Legal Issues Addressed

Jurisdictional Limitation of the Oklahoma Merit Protection Commission

Application: The Commission does not have the jurisdiction to compel actions involving the Governor, as established by the constitutional provisions.

Reasoning: A mandamus request to compel a hearing for J.B. Bennett v. Governor David Walters (Case No. MPC 91-405) is denied, as the Oklahoma Merit Protection Commission lacks jurisdiction over the Governor, referencing Oklahoma Constitution Article VIII, Section 1.

Mandatory Hearing Requirement under 74 O.S.Supp.1986 § 841.7

Application: The statute requires the Oklahoma Merit Protection Commission to hold a hearing within thirty days of a request for review, emphasizing the mandatory nature of this timeline.

Reasoning: The statute explicitly requires the Commission to schedule a hearing within thirty days following a request for review, with the term 'shall' interpreted as mandatory, lacking any contrary intent in the statutory language.