You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

PSHS ALPHA PARTNERS, LTD., etc. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Citation: Not availableDocket: 21-1615

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; December 14, 2021; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Third District Court of Appeal of Florida issued an opinion on December 15, 2021, in case number 3D21-1615, involving PSHS Alpha Partners, Ltd. (Appellant) and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Appellee). The appeal arose from a Miami-Dade County court order dated July 19, 2021, which dismissed the case based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. State Farm acknowledged its error, stating that the appropriate action should have been to transfer the case rather than dismiss it. Consequently, the appellate court reversed the lower court's order and remanded the case for further proceedings, referencing Florida Statute 47.122, which allows for the transfer of civil actions for the convenience of parties or in the interest of justice.

Legal Issues Addressed

Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens

Application: The case was initially dismissed based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens, but this application was found to be incorrect as the appropriate action should have been a transfer of venue.

Reasoning: The appeal arose from a Miami-Dade County court order dated July 19, 2021, which dismissed the case based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens.

Error Acknowledgment by Appellee

Application: State Farm acknowledged that the dismissal was an error, indicating that the correct procedure would have been to seek a transfer of the case.

Reasoning: State Farm acknowledged its error, stating that the appropriate action should have been to transfer the case rather than dismiss it.

Transfer of Venue under Florida Statute 47.122

Application: The appellate court determined that the case should be transferred rather than dismissed, in accordance with Florida Statute 47.122, which allows for such action for the convenience of parties or in the interest of justice.

Reasoning: The appellate court reversed the lower court's order and remanded the case for further proceedings, referencing Florida Statute 47.122, which allows for the transfer of civil actions for the convenience of parties or in the interest of justice.