Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
FITZGERALD VS. MOBILE BILLBOARDS, LLC
Citation: 2018 NV 30Docket: 72803
Court: Nevada Supreme Court; May 3, 2018; Nevada; State Supreme Court
Original Court Document: View Document
The document pertains to case number 72803, Fitzgerald vs. Mobile Billboards, LLC, which is classified as a civil appeal in the Supreme Court of Nevada. The case is linked to related case 79698 from the Clark County Eighth Judicial District. The appellant, Sean Fitzgerald, is represented by attorneys James P. Kemp and Victoria L. Neal, while the respondents, Mobile Billboards, LLC and Vincent Bartello, have previously engaged various attorneys from Hurtik Law Associates, with Bartello representing himself. Key procedural events include the filing of a notice of appeal on April 13, 2017, and the subsequent payment of a filing fee. The appeal was initially referred to a settlement program, but was later deemed inappropriate for mediation. The appeal was removed from the settlement program on May 23, 2017, reinstating the briefing schedule. Various motions were filed, including a motion for extension based on Bartello's bankruptcy dismissal. On October 30, 2017, the court indicated that it would decide the case based solely on the appellant's opening brief without an answering brief from the respondents. The appellant submitted the opening brief and accompanying documents on November 14, 2017. The court issued an opinion on May 3, 2018, reversing and remanding the case. The remittitur was subsequently issued on May 30, 2018, indicating the case was closed after being filed with the District Court Clerk on June 4, 2018.