Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
STATE VS. INZUNZA (RIGOBERTO)
Citation: 2019 NV 69Docket: 75662
Court: Nevada Supreme Court; December 25, 2019; Nevada; State Supreme Court
Original Court Document: View Document
Case Number 75662, titled *State vs. Inzunza (Rigoberto)*, pertains to a criminal appeal adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada, originating from the Clark County Eighth Judicial District. The appeal was filed on April 25, 2018, with the filing fee waived. A notice of appeal was submitted on the same day, initiating the case in the Supreme Court. Key procedural events include: - A notice to file a docketing statement was issued on May 30, 2018, with a 10-day compliance requirement. - The docketing statement was filed on June 4, 2018, alongside a certificate indicating no transcripts were requested. - The appellant filed a motion for an extension of time for the opening brief on August 23, 2018, which was approved, setting the new due date for September 24, 2018. - The appellant's opening brief and the first volume of the appendix were filed on September 24, 2018. - The respondent's answering brief was filed on December 11, 2018, after a previously granted extension. - The appellant's reply brief was filed on January 10, 2019. Subsequent motions included a request from the respondent to strike the appellant's reply brief, which was denied by the court on March 15, 2019. Oral arguments were held on July 19, 2019, after which the case was submitted for decision. The court issued its opinion on December 26, 2019, affirming the lower court's decision with Justices Hardesty, Stiglich, and Silver in the majority. The remittitur was issued on January 21, 2020, marking the case's closure. Contact information for obtaining official records is provided, and it is noted that the information in the document should not be solely relied upon as an official record.