Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United Healthcare Ins. Co. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Fremont Emergency Servs. (Mandavia), Ltd.)
Citation: Not availableDocket: 83629
Court: Nevada Supreme Court; October 25, 2021; Nevada; State Supreme Court
Original Court Document: View Document
The document pertains to appellate case number 83629 involving the parties United Healthcare Insurance Company and Fremont Emergency Services Mandavia, Ltd. It is classified as an original civil proceeding concerning mandamus/prohibition. The case is currently closed, with a notice in lieu of remittitur issued. For access to official records or specific documents, parties are directed to contact the Clerk's Office of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600, as some documents may not be available online. Multiple petitioners are represented by a group of attorneys from Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn, Dial, LLC, and Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, all based in Las Vegas. The case originated from the Clark County Eighth Judicial District. Real Party in Interest includes Crum Stefanko and Jones, Ltd., Fremont Emergency Services (Mandavia, Ltd.), and Team Physicians of Nevada-Mandavia, P.C., each represented by various attorneys from the law firms Ahmad, Zavistanos, Anaipakos, Alavi, Mensing, P.C., Lash, Goldberg LLP, and McDonald Carano LLP. Key individuals listed are Joseph Y. Ahmad, Jonathan E. Feuer, Justin C. Fineberg, Kristen T. Gallagher, Martin B. Goldberg, Michael Killingsworth, Rachel H. LeBlanc, P. Kevin Leyendecker, Louis Liao, Pat Lundvall, Jason S. McManis, Amanda M. Perach, Emily L. Pincow, Jane L. Robinson, David R. Ruffner, Jonathan E. Siegelaub, Ashley Singrossi, and John Zavitsanos. The Respondents include Nancy L. Allf and The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada for Clark County. Docket entries reveal a filing fee of $250 paid by Daniel F. Polsenberg on October 15, 2021, along with a Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition, an Appendix to the Petition, and a Motion to File Portions of the Appendix Under Seal. Additionally, an Emergency Motion to Stay enforcement of subpoenas was filed on October 20, 2021, pending the petition and motion for interim stay. On October 20, 2021, petitioners filed an appendix related to their emergency motion to stay the enforcement of subpoenas. The following day, real parties in interest submitted their opposition to this motion. On October 24, 2021, the petitioners filed a motion to exceed the page limit for their reply concerning the emergency motion, which was subsequently granted. The same day, they submitted their reply. On October 25, 2021, a second volume of the petitioner's appendix, sealed under a district court protective order, was filed. An order was issued denying the petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition, granting the petitioners' request to exceed the page limit for their reply, and allowing a portion of the appendix to be filed under seal. The emergency motion for a stay was deemed moot following the order. On November 19, 2021, a notice in lieu of remittitur was issued, and the case was subsequently closed.