Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Triangulum Partners, Llc Vs. Galaxy Gaming, Inc.
Citation: Not availableDocket: 82828
Court: Nevada Supreme Court; November 15, 2021; Nevada; State Supreme Court
Original Court Document: View Document
Case number 82828 pertains to the appeal of Triangulum Partners, LLC against Galaxy Gaming, Inc., among other parties, in the Supreme Court of Nevada. The case is classified as a civil appeal originating from the Clark County Eighth Judicial District. Several related cases are noted: 79555, 79924, and 81936. The case has a status of "case closed" and is designated as exempt from oral argument. The appellant, Triangulum Partners, LLC, is represented by attorneys Dylan T. Ciciliano and Erika A. Pike from Garman Turner Gordon. The respondents, including Galaxy Gaming, Inc. and several individuals such as the Estate of Norman Desrosiers and Janice Desrosiers, are represented by multiple attorneys from Pisanelli Bice, PLLC, including James J. Pisanelli, Emily Allen-Wiles Buchwald, and others. Key docket entries include the filing of a notice of appeal and a notice of cross-appeal, both of which required filing fees that were subsequently paid. The appeal was initially set to be assigned to a settlement program, but it was later determined that it would not be included in that program. A transcript request was filed, and a certificate of no transcript request was noted. All relevant contact information for the Clerk’s Office is provided for further inquiries, along with a disclaimer about the availability of documents and the non-official nature of online information. On May 18, 2021, the Appellant/Cross-Respondents filed a motion to redact portions of their docketing statement, which was subsequently granted on May 28, 2021. The clerk was instructed to file the redacted docketing statement while sealing the unredacted attachment received on May 21, 2021. Multiple docketing statements from Respondents/Cross-Appellants were filed on June 4, 2021. On August 26, 2021, an extension was granted for the Appellant/Cross-Respondents to submit their opening brief and appendix by September 15, 2021. On September 7, 2021, the court issued an order to show cause regarding potential dismissal of the appeal due to jurisdictional issues, noting that Robert B. Saucier had been erroneously listed as an appellant. The court allowed for a modification of the appeal caption and required any objections within seven days. Following this, on October 7, 2021, a motion for a stipulated stay of proceedings was filed, which was granted on October 18, 2021, allowing the parties until January 14, 2022, to respond to the order to show cause. Finally, on November 15, 2021, a stipulation to dismiss the appeal was filed, and the appeal was dismissed the next day, with each party bearing their own costs and attorney fees. The case was closed without a remittitur being issued.