Narrative Opinion Summary
The trial court's judgment denying Dean Team Kirkwood, Inc. and Colin Berndt's motion to compel arbitration and stay the action is affirmed. The court notes that an extended opinion would not have precedential value, but a memorandum detailing the reasons for the decision has been provided to the parties. The affirmation is in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation under Rule 84.16(b)subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The affirmation of the trial court's judgment was made in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Reasoning: The affirmation is in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Arbitration and Motion to Compelsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court denied the motion to compel arbitration and stay the action, affirming the trial court's judgment.
Reasoning: The trial court's judgment denying Dean Team Kirkwood, Inc. and Colin Berndt's motion to compel arbitration and stay the action is affirmed.
Precedential Value of Extended Opinionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court determined that an extended opinion would not be of precedential value, thus opting for a memorandum to detail the reasons for the decision.
Reasoning: The court notes that an extended opinion would not have precedential value, but a memorandum detailing the reasons for the decision has been provided to the parties.