You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

State v. Moorehead

Citations: 392 S.W.3d 531; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 246; 2013 WL 704442Docket: No. ED 98160

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals; February 25, 2013; Missouri; State Appellate Court

EnglishEspañolSimplified EnglishEspañol Fácil
Gregory Moorehead appeals the trial court's judgment following his conviction by a jury for forcible rape and forcible sodomy. After reviewing the parties' briefs and the appeal record, the court found no legal errors. A written opinion was deemed unnecessary, but the parties received a memorandum opinion outlining the facts and rationale for the order. The motion court's judgment is affirmed per Rule 30.25(b).