Narrative Opinion Summary
Franklin Credit Management Corporation (FCM) appeals the trial court's decision to deny its motion to set aside a default judgment in Frieda Knittel's action to quiet title. The appellate court concludes that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its ruling. Consequently, the appellate court affirms the trial court's judgment. The court notes that an extended opinion would not hold precedential value but provides a memorandum to the parties detailing the reasons for the decision. The affirmation is made under Rule 84.16(b).
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review under Rule 84.16(b)subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, noting that a detailed opinion would not provide precedential value but issued a memorandum to explain the decision to the parties.
Reasoning: The court notes that an extended opinion would not hold precedential value but provides a memorandum to the parties detailing the reasons for the decision. The affirmation is made under Rule 84.16(b).
Default Judgment and Motion to Set Asidesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court determined that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying FCM's motion to set aside the default judgment in the action to quiet title.
Reasoning: Franklin Credit Management Corporation (FCM) appeals the trial court's decision to deny its motion to set aside a default judgment in Frieda Knittel's action to quiet title.