Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Snelling v. Taylor
Citations: 207 S.W.3d 628; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1571; 2006 WL 3007803Docket: No. ED 87540
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals; October 24, 2006; Missouri; State Appellate Court
Lonnie Snelling appeals the trial court's dismissal of certain counts of his petition against defendants John Taylor, Taylor’s Auto Salvage, Andreyuk, Brazil, P.C., and Michael P. Brazil. Snelling contests the dismissal based on the statute of limitations and failure to state a claim. He also challenges the judgment in favor of Taylor and Taylor’s Auto Salvage on the remaining counts after trial. Upon reviewing the parties' briefs and the record, the appellate court finds no legal error. The court affirms the trial court's judgment, stating that no jurisprudential purpose is served by a written opinion, but a memorandum opinion has been provided to the parties for informational purposes detailing the facts and reasons for the order. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).