descrybe logo
You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

State v. Fulghum

Citations: 148 S.W.3d 842; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1556; 2004 WL 2381509Docket: No. ED 83280

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals; October 26, 2004; Missouri; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

John Fulghum's appeal against the jury's verdict convicting him of stealing, third offense, has been reviewed. The court found no legal errors in the case and determined that an extended opinion was unnecessary. A memorandum opinion has been provided solely for the parties, outlining the reasons for the decision. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Judgment under Rule 30.25(b)

Application: The judgment against John Fulghum was affirmed by the appellate court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b), indicating that the appeal did not warrant a published opinion.

Reasoning: The judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Appellate Review of Jury Verdict

Application: The appellate court reviews the jury's verdict for legal errors and, in this case, found none, affirming the conviction.

Reasoning: The court found no legal errors in the case and determined that an extended opinion was unnecessary.